'At Least I Didn't Lose Money' - Nominal Loss Aversion Shapes Evaluations of Housing Transactions
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
The Money Markets and Housing--I
used to write and make speeches about all the ways in which our society was messing itself up, and how it could all be improved, and in his case the things that he talked about were fairly obvious and straightforward, and his conclusions were equally--what shall we say--visionary and utopian as mine. I don’t want any of you to think that I really believe that it is politically likely that we ar...
متن کاملElectronic Money Laundering Detection in Transactions of Payment Service Providers
Under the coverage of legitimate commerce, criminals money-launder their illicit incomes through the payment gateways provided by Payment Service Providers (PSP). In order to do money-laundering forensics in transactions of PSP companies, a new method was proposed by Hojati et al which is done through detecting deviations from class behavior based on peer group analysis (PGA) method. Our experi...
متن کاملWhy hospital-owned medical groups lose money.
By David N. Gans, MSHA, FACMPE, vice president, MGMAACMPE Innovation and Research, [email protected] In the mid-1990s, many hospital systems adopted strategic plans that included hiring physicians or purchasing medical groups to build vertically integrated delivery systems (IDSs) of providers and locations of care. This strategy worked well for many health systems, but others hemorrhaged money. By t...
متن کاملInflation , Nominal Debt , Housing , and Welfare ∗
This paper evaluates the welfare effects of lowering the long-run inflation target in a life-cycle model of housing, nominal debts, and money (ie., a liquid asset). To smooth out idiosyncratic earnings risk, agents make portfolio choices in the presence of transactions costs and borrowing constraints. We find that lowering inflation from 2% to 1% improves welfare and that the welfare gain is ev...
متن کاملHow to Lose with Least Probability
Two players alternate tossing a biased coin where the probability of getting heads is p. The current player is awarded α points for tails and α + β for heads. The first player reaching n points wins. For a completely unfair coin the player going first certainly wins. For other coin biases, the player going first has the advantage, but the advantage depends on the coin bias. We calculate the fir...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: SSRN Electronic Journal
سال: 2012
ISSN: 1556-5068
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2162415